Skip to content

AIRCHILL-CA: Cardiac Arrest Clinical Trial Synopsis

.prot{–ink:#0B1226;–txt:#3D4756;–line:#E4E8EE;–tint:#F6F8FC;–blue:#13A2EE;–mag:#C11C7A;font-family:Inter,-apple-system,”Segoe UI”,Arial,sans-serif;color:var(–ink)}.prot *{box-sizing:border-box}.prot .wrap{max-width:1180px;margin:auto}.prot .hero{padding:112px 24px 76px;background:radial-gradient(900px 520px at 10% 0%,rgba(193,28,122,.46),transparent 62%),radial-gradient(880px 520px at 92% 100%,rgba(19,162,238,.36),transparent 62%),#080E20;color:#fff}.prot .sec{padding:66px 24px}.prot .light{background:var(–tint)}.prot .dark{background:#0B1226;color:#fff}.prot .k{font-size:12px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.14em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#F3B8D8;margin:0 0 14px}.prot h1{font-size:clamp(40px,6vw,68px);line-height:1.02;letter-spacing:-.04em;margin:0 0 18px;max-width:17ch}.prot h2{font-size:clamp(28px,4vw,44px);letter-spacing:-.03em;margin:0 0 16px}.prot h3{font-size:19px;margin:0 0 8px}.prot p,.prot li{line-height:1.65}.prot .lead{font-size:18px;color:#C8D6E7;max-width:82ch}.prot .sec .lead{color:var(–txt)}.prot .grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(min(100%,260px),1fr));gap:16px;margin-top:26px}.prot .card{background:#fff;border:1px solid var(–line);border-radius:17px;padding:22px}.prot .tag{font-size:11px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.11em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(–mag);margin-bottom:10px}.prot .table{overflow:auto;border:1px solid var(–line);border-radius:17px;margin-top:26px;background:#fff}.prot table{border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;min-width:900px}.prot th,.prot td{padding:13px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid var(–line);text-align:left;vertical-align:top;font-size:13.5px;line-height:1.5}.prot th{background:#0B1226;color:#fff;font-size:11px;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.05em}.prot .call{margin-top:24px;border-left:4px solid var(–mag);background:#111A30;color:#C8D6E7;padding:19px 21px;border-radius:0 13px 13px 0;line-height:1.65}.prot .call strong{color:#fff}.prot .num{font-size:34px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:-.04em}.prot a{color:#0B6FA6}.prot .dark a{color:#8FD8FA}.prot .small{font-size:12.5px;color:#6F7B8C}@media(max-width:760px){.prot .sec{padding:52px 18px}.prot .hero{padding-left:18px;padding-right:18px}}

Protocol synopsis · development version 1.0

AIRCHILL-CA: Cardiac Arrest Clinical Trial Programme

A staged, multicentre, randomised clinical-investigation programme designed to determine whether very early AIRCHILL respiratory cooling, delivered without compromising ventilation, improves neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This is a development synopsis for regulator, investigator, ethics and statistical discussion; it is not yet a final approved CIP.

Synopsis at a glance

Primary confirmatory concept.

Design

Multicentre, randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded

1:1 AIRCHILL plus guideline-based care versus guideline-based care without active AIRCHILL respiratory cooling.

Population

Selected adult OHCA

Adults requiring invasive ventilation after OHCA, unconscious after ROSC, with the pivotal phenotype frozen after Phase II. Initial shockable rhythm is the leading first-pivotal candidate.

Primary endpoint

90-day neurological outcome

Blinded favourable neurological outcome at approximately 90 days, with full mRS distribution and mortality as key secondary outcomes.

Planning N
≈2,300

Working Phase-III target for a +7 percentage-point absolute benefit at 90% power, two-sided α=0.05 and 5% missing primary endpoint. Final N is re-estimated from AIRCHILL Phase-II data.

Development sequence

Three clinical gates before the confirmatory claim.

StageTarget NMain purposeGo / no-go output
CA-1 · Emergency feasibility80–120Deployment, timing, ventilation continuity, airway/cardiovascular safety, protocol adherence, measurable thermal separation.Predefined device start success, treatment continuity, safety and thermal-performance thresholds met.
CA-2 · Randomised signal finding300–500Estimate neurological event rates, effect size, timing interaction and phenotype heterogeneity; refine thermal dose.Freeze pivotal phenotype, treatment timing, outcome definition and Phase-III effect assumption.
CA-3 · Confirmatory efficacy≈1,400–2,300 if Phase-II benefit is 7–9 pp; larger for smaller effectsDefinitive patient-relevant neurological efficacy with blinded outcome assessment.Primary estimand and multiplicity-controlled confirmatory analysis.

Research question & estimand

What the pivotal trial is intended to prove.

Population

Adults with OHCA who achieve ROSC, remain unconscious and require invasive ventilation, meeting the final prospectively defined phenotype.

Treatment

AIRCHILL respiratory cooling initiated as early as operationally feasible after the airway is secured, then continued through transport and the protocol-defined early post-ROSC period.

Comparator

Guideline-based ventilation, post-resuscitation care and temperature management without active AIRCHILL respiratory cooling.

Estimand

Treatment-policy estimand for the difference in 90-day neurological outcome attributable to assignment to AIRCHILL strategy, with prespecified handling of death, withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, crossover and missing outcome data.

Critical hypothesis distinction. AIRCHILL is not intended to re-test generic late hospital hypothermia. The confirmatory question is whether an earlier respiratory route, with a different thermal distribution and prospectively selected phenotype, improves patient outcome without offsetting harm.

Eligibility framework

Draft inclusion and exclusion criteria.

DomainDraft criterionRationale
Age≥18 years; upper age cap only if justified by Phase-II data or regulator/investigator consensus.Avoid an arbitrary restriction unless frailty or competing-risk data justify it.
Arrest settingOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac or otherwise protocol-eligible cause.Creates a coherent first pivotal population.
ROSCSustained ROSC according to protocol definition before randomisation for the post-ROSC efficacy programme.Separates the post-arrest treatment question from intra-arrest use.
Neurological statusUnconscious / unable to follow commands after ROSC and clinically requiring invasive ventilation.Targets patients at risk of hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury and avoids elective intubation for research.
TimingRandomisation and AIRCHILL initiation within a predefined maximum interval from ROSC / airway control, selected from feasibility data.Protects the early-treatment hypothesis.
Leading pivotal phenotypeInitial shockable rhythm considered for first pivotal cohort; final decision from CA-2.Reduces heterogeneity and follows evidence-enrichment logic used in contemporary cooling research.
Major exclusionsKnown pregnancy if required by risk assessment; severe pre-arrest dependency incompatible with the chosen outcome claim; known terminal illness with short life expectancy; uncontrollable major bleeding; refractory severe hypoxaemia/ventilatory instability incompatible with study gas-path requirements; contraindication identified by device risk analysis; obvious non-survivable injury; previous enrolment where relevant.Safety, interpretability and competing-risk control.
Consent pathwayEmergency/deferred consent or legally authorised representative pathway according to jurisdiction, with prompt survivor consent when capacity returns.Required for time-critical enrolment; final process is jurisdiction-specific.

Exact criteria remain subject to ISO 14155 clinical investigation planning, EU MDR Annex XV, national emergency-consent law and any FDA IDE / significant-risk requirements.

Intervention & co-interventions

Protocolise the complete treatment contrast.

AIRCHILL dose

Temperature × humidity × flow × duration

The final respiratory thermal dose is selected from bench, large-animal, human airway-safety and CA-1/CA-2 data. Record patient-side temperature, absolute humidity, minute ventilation, FiO₂, airway pressure and cumulative exposure continuously or at protocol-defined frequency.

Ventilation

Primary life-support function protected

Prespecified tidal-volume / pressure strategy, PEEP, oxygen and CO₂ targets consistent with guideline care. AIRCHILL cannot be continued through clinically significant ventilation compromise.

Temperature care

Standardise downstream management

Fever prevention, hospital temperature management and rewarming must be protocolised or tightly documented to prevent uncontrolled co-intervention bias.

Neuroprognostication

Prevent self-fulfilling outcome bias

Prespecify delayed, multimodal neuroprognostication and withdrawal-of-life-support safeguards consistent with current post-resuscitation practice.

Endpoints

Patient outcome first, mechanism underneath.

LevelEndpoint set
Primary confirmatoryBlinded favourable neurological outcome at ~90 days, exact mRS/CPC definition frozen before Phase III. A full ordinal mRS analysis should be included even if the confirmatory claim uses a dichotomy.
Key secondaryAll-cause mortality; full 90-day mRS; CPC; EQ-5D-5L; cognitive/participation measure where feasible; ICU/hospital length of stay; ventilator-free days.
Thermal performanceTime to first measurable thermal effect; temperature trajectory; thermal separation; cumulative respiratory thermal dose; rewarming.
SafetyDevice-related SAE; haemodynamically significant arrhythmia; hypotension/vasopressor escalation; ventilation failure/interruption; bronchospasm; gas-exchange deterioration; pneumonia; bleeding; seizures; airway injury signals.
Health economicsEQ-5D-5L, EMS/device use, ICU and ward days, procedures, rehabilitation, discharge destination, readmissions, long-term care and productivity where relevant.

Randomisation & blinding

Protect internal validity in a treatment that cannot be fully blinded.

Allocation

Central 1:1 randomisation using concealed sequence generation. Variable block sizes; blocks not disclosed to sites.

Stratification

At minimum site/EMS system and the final key phenotype variable. Candidate factors: initial rhythm, witnessed status and time-to-ROSC, but avoid excessive stratification.

Blinding

Treating clinicians cannot be blinded. 90-day outcome assessors, adjudication committees and central statisticians should remain masked whenever operationally possible.

Crossovers

All crossover and treatment interruption reasons are timestamped and analysed under intention-to-treat; per-protocol and as-treated analyses remain sensitivity analyses.

Statistics

Statistical analysis plan skeleton.

TopicPrespecified approach
Primary populationIntention-to-treat. Safety population based on actual device exposure in parallel.
Primary analysisRegression model appropriate to the final primary endpoint; report absolute risk difference, relative effect and confidence interval. If ordinal mRS is confirmatory, use proportional-odds modelling with assumption checks and prespecified robust sensitivity analysis.
Covariate adjustmentSmall, prespecified set of strong prognostic variables such as age, initial rhythm, witnessed arrest/bystander CPR and time-to-ROSC, finalised before unblinding.
Missing dataMinimise via central follow-up. Prespecified multiple-imputation / worst-reasonable-case sensitivity depending missingness mechanism; death is not treated as ordinary missingness.
MultiplicityHierarchical testing or gatekeeping across key secondary outcomes. Exploratory biomarkers and subgroups clearly labelled.
SubgroupsOnly a small number of mechanistically justified interactions: treatment timing, initial rhythm, baseline temperature, sex, age band, and thermal-dose achievement. No post-hoc subgroup claim substitution.
Intercurrent eventsWithdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, crossover, rescue temperature therapy and device interruption handled explicitly under the estimand framework.

Interim & DSMB

Independent oversight without inflating false-positive risk.

Safety reviews

Early and recurrent

DSMB/Safety Review Committee reviews unblinded safety after predefined early cohorts and then at regular information fractions. Any emergency feasibility stage can use more frequent review.

Efficacy interim

One formal interim is preferred

Illustrative Phase-III plan: one interim at ~50% information using a conservative alpha-spending boundary for overwhelming efficacy and a non-binding futility rule. Exact boundary chosen by the trial statistician.

Stop / hold domains

Device, ventilation, haemodynamics, mortality

Predefined triggers for unexpected device-related SAE, ventilation compromise, clinically meaningful excess arrhythmia/hypotension, airway injury signal or a sustained mortality imbalance.

Sample-size re-estimation

Prefer blinded nuisance-parameter update

A blinded update of control-event rate or outcome variance may be used. Unblinded effect-based adaptation should only be used if prospectively designed with type-I-error control.

DSMB principle. Numeric stopping thresholds should be specified in the final charter only after the device hazard analysis, CA-1/CA-2 event distributions and regulator/investigator review. This synopsis defines the decision domains but does not invent unsupported toxicity thresholds.

Recruitment model

What it takes to enrol ~2,300 pivotal patients.

ScenarioActive EMS / hospital networksRandomised per network / yearAnnual enrolmentApprox. active recruitment
Conservative3012360~6.4 years
Base case4518810~2.8 years
High-performance network60201,200~1.9 years

These are operational planning assumptions. Feasibility must be based on screened OHCA volume, eligibility fraction, deferred-consent feasibility, EMS training burden, treatment-start success and real site-by-site run-in performance.

Site activation gate

Simulation/certification of AIRCHILL setup, airway circuit integration, randomisation, timestamp capture, adverse-event escalation and hospital handover before first enrolment.

Run-in metrics

Screen-to-randomise ratio, eligible-not-enrolled reasons, device-start success, median start delay, protocol adherence and 90-day follow-up completion.

Performance management

Pause low-performing sites that cannot deliver the intended timing or follow-up; do not compensate for poor exposure quality merely by adding more patients.

Phase-II → Phase-III go/no-go

Decision rule before committing to the pivotal trial.

Proceed only if CA-2 shows: acceptable device/airway/cardiovascular safety; reproducible early treatment delivery; meaningful thermal separation; no clinically important compromise of ventilation; a control-event rate that supports feasible powering; and a neurological effect estimate whose confidence interval and mechanistic pattern justify a confirmatory study. The final pivotal N should then be recalculated from the observed AIRCHILL data rather than copied from PRINCESS2 or any other external technology.

Protocol standards & benchmarks

Framework used for the synopsis.

ISO 14155:2026 for medical-device clinical investigations · EU MDR 2017/745 Annex XV · SPIRIT protocol reporting principles · ICH E9/E9(R1) estimand/statistical principles where applicable · FDA pivotal medical-device study guidance and IDE framework · PRINCESS2 as a contemporary prehospital cooling design benchmark.

Back to the cardiac-arrest & stroke validation plan →