AIRCHILL-CA: Cardiac Arrest Clinical Trial Synopsis
.prot{–ink:#0B1226;–txt:#3D4756;–line:#E4E8EE;–tint:#F6F8FC;–blue:#13A2EE;–mag:#C11C7A;font-family:Inter,-apple-system,”Segoe UI”,Arial,sans-serif;color:var(–ink)}.prot *{box-sizing:border-box}.prot .wrap{max-width:1180px;margin:auto}.prot .hero{padding:112px 24px 76px;background:radial-gradient(900px 520px at 10% 0%,rgba(193,28,122,.46),transparent 62%),radial-gradient(880px 520px at 92% 100%,rgba(19,162,238,.36),transparent 62%),#080E20;color:#fff}.prot .sec{padding:66px 24px}.prot .light{background:var(–tint)}.prot .dark{background:#0B1226;color:#fff}.prot .k{font-size:12px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.14em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#F3B8D8;margin:0 0 14px}.prot h1{font-size:clamp(40px,6vw,68px);line-height:1.02;letter-spacing:-.04em;margin:0 0 18px;max-width:17ch}.prot h2{font-size:clamp(28px,4vw,44px);letter-spacing:-.03em;margin:0 0 16px}.prot h3{font-size:19px;margin:0 0 8px}.prot p,.prot li{line-height:1.65}.prot .lead{font-size:18px;color:#C8D6E7;max-width:82ch}.prot .sec .lead{color:var(–txt)}.prot .grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit,minmax(min(100%,260px),1fr));gap:16px;margin-top:26px}.prot .card{background:#fff;border:1px solid var(–line);border-radius:17px;padding:22px}.prot .tag{font-size:11px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:.11em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(–mag);margin-bottom:10px}.prot .table{overflow:auto;border:1px solid var(–line);border-radius:17px;margin-top:26px;background:#fff}.prot table{border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;min-width:900px}.prot th,.prot td{padding:13px 14px;border-bottom:1px solid var(–line);text-align:left;vertical-align:top;font-size:13.5px;line-height:1.5}.prot th{background:#0B1226;color:#fff;font-size:11px;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.05em}.prot .call{margin-top:24px;border-left:4px solid var(–mag);background:#111A30;color:#C8D6E7;padding:19px 21px;border-radius:0 13px 13px 0;line-height:1.65}.prot .call strong{color:#fff}.prot .num{font-size:34px;font-weight:800;letter-spacing:-.04em}.prot a{color:#0B6FA6}.prot .dark a{color:#8FD8FA}.prot .small{font-size:12.5px;color:#6F7B8C}@media(max-width:760px){.prot .sec{padding:52px 18px}.prot .hero{padding-left:18px;padding-right:18px}}Protocol synopsis · development version 1.0
AIRCHILL-CA: Cardiac Arrest Clinical Trial Programme
A staged, multicentre, randomised clinical-investigation programme designed to determine whether very early AIRCHILL respiratory cooling, delivered without compromising ventilation, improves neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This is a development synopsis for regulator, investigator, ethics and statistical discussion; it is not yet a final approved CIP.
Synopsis at a glance
Primary confirmatory concept.
Multicentre, randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded
1:1 AIRCHILL plus guideline-based care versus guideline-based care without active AIRCHILL respiratory cooling.
Selected adult OHCA
Adults requiring invasive ventilation after OHCA, unconscious after ROSC, with the pivotal phenotype frozen after Phase II. Initial shockable rhythm is the leading first-pivotal candidate.
90-day neurological outcome
Blinded favourable neurological outcome at approximately 90 days, with full mRS distribution and mortality as key secondary outcomes.
Working Phase-III target for a +7 percentage-point absolute benefit at 90% power, two-sided α=0.05 and 5% missing primary endpoint. Final N is re-estimated from AIRCHILL Phase-II data.
Development sequence
Three clinical gates before the confirmatory claim.
| Stage | Target N | Main purpose | Go / no-go output |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA-1 · Emergency feasibility | 80–120 | Deployment, timing, ventilation continuity, airway/cardiovascular safety, protocol adherence, measurable thermal separation. | Predefined device start success, treatment continuity, safety and thermal-performance thresholds met. |
| CA-2 · Randomised signal finding | 300–500 | Estimate neurological event rates, effect size, timing interaction and phenotype heterogeneity; refine thermal dose. | Freeze pivotal phenotype, treatment timing, outcome definition and Phase-III effect assumption. |
| CA-3 · Confirmatory efficacy | ≈1,400–2,300 if Phase-II benefit is 7–9 pp; larger for smaller effects | Definitive patient-relevant neurological efficacy with blinded outcome assessment. | Primary estimand and multiplicity-controlled confirmatory analysis. |
Research question & estimand
What the pivotal trial is intended to prove.
Adults with OHCA who achieve ROSC, remain unconscious and require invasive ventilation, meeting the final prospectively defined phenotype.
AIRCHILL respiratory cooling initiated as early as operationally feasible after the airway is secured, then continued through transport and the protocol-defined early post-ROSC period.
Guideline-based ventilation, post-resuscitation care and temperature management without active AIRCHILL respiratory cooling.
Treatment-policy estimand for the difference in 90-day neurological outcome attributable to assignment to AIRCHILL strategy, with prespecified handling of death, withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, crossover and missing outcome data.
Eligibility framework
Draft inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Domain | Draft criterion | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ≥18 years; upper age cap only if justified by Phase-II data or regulator/investigator consensus. | Avoid an arbitrary restriction unless frailty or competing-risk data justify it. |
| Arrest setting | Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac or otherwise protocol-eligible cause. | Creates a coherent first pivotal population. |
| ROSC | Sustained ROSC according to protocol definition before randomisation for the post-ROSC efficacy programme. | Separates the post-arrest treatment question from intra-arrest use. |
| Neurological status | Unconscious / unable to follow commands after ROSC and clinically requiring invasive ventilation. | Targets patients at risk of hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury and avoids elective intubation for research. |
| Timing | Randomisation and AIRCHILL initiation within a predefined maximum interval from ROSC / airway control, selected from feasibility data. | Protects the early-treatment hypothesis. |
| Leading pivotal phenotype | Initial shockable rhythm considered for first pivotal cohort; final decision from CA-2. | Reduces heterogeneity and follows evidence-enrichment logic used in contemporary cooling research. |
| Major exclusions | Known pregnancy if required by risk assessment; severe pre-arrest dependency incompatible with the chosen outcome claim; known terminal illness with short life expectancy; uncontrollable major bleeding; refractory severe hypoxaemia/ventilatory instability incompatible with study gas-path requirements; contraindication identified by device risk analysis; obvious non-survivable injury; previous enrolment where relevant. | Safety, interpretability and competing-risk control. |
| Consent pathway | Emergency/deferred consent or legally authorised representative pathway according to jurisdiction, with prompt survivor consent when capacity returns. | Required for time-critical enrolment; final process is jurisdiction-specific. |
Exact criteria remain subject to ISO 14155 clinical investigation planning, EU MDR Annex XV, national emergency-consent law and any FDA IDE / significant-risk requirements.
Intervention & co-interventions
Protocolise the complete treatment contrast.
Temperature × humidity × flow × duration
The final respiratory thermal dose is selected from bench, large-animal, human airway-safety and CA-1/CA-2 data. Record patient-side temperature, absolute humidity, minute ventilation, FiO₂, airway pressure and cumulative exposure continuously or at protocol-defined frequency.
Primary life-support function protected
Prespecified tidal-volume / pressure strategy, PEEP, oxygen and CO₂ targets consistent with guideline care. AIRCHILL cannot be continued through clinically significant ventilation compromise.
Standardise downstream management
Fever prevention, hospital temperature management and rewarming must be protocolised or tightly documented to prevent uncontrolled co-intervention bias.
Prevent self-fulfilling outcome bias
Prespecify delayed, multimodal neuroprognostication and withdrawal-of-life-support safeguards consistent with current post-resuscitation practice.
Endpoints
Patient outcome first, mechanism underneath.
| Level | Endpoint set |
|---|---|
| Primary confirmatory | Blinded favourable neurological outcome at ~90 days, exact mRS/CPC definition frozen before Phase III. A full ordinal mRS analysis should be included even if the confirmatory claim uses a dichotomy. |
| Key secondary | All-cause mortality; full 90-day mRS; CPC; EQ-5D-5L; cognitive/participation measure where feasible; ICU/hospital length of stay; ventilator-free days. |
| Thermal performance | Time to first measurable thermal effect; temperature trajectory; thermal separation; cumulative respiratory thermal dose; rewarming. |
| Safety | Device-related SAE; haemodynamically significant arrhythmia; hypotension/vasopressor escalation; ventilation failure/interruption; bronchospasm; gas-exchange deterioration; pneumonia; bleeding; seizures; airway injury signals. |
| Health economics | EQ-5D-5L, EMS/device use, ICU and ward days, procedures, rehabilitation, discharge destination, readmissions, long-term care and productivity where relevant. |
Randomisation & blinding
Protect internal validity in a treatment that cannot be fully blinded.
Central 1:1 randomisation using concealed sequence generation. Variable block sizes; blocks not disclosed to sites.
At minimum site/EMS system and the final key phenotype variable. Candidate factors: initial rhythm, witnessed status and time-to-ROSC, but avoid excessive stratification.
Treating clinicians cannot be blinded. 90-day outcome assessors, adjudication committees and central statisticians should remain masked whenever operationally possible.
All crossover and treatment interruption reasons are timestamped and analysed under intention-to-treat; per-protocol and as-treated analyses remain sensitivity analyses.
Statistics
Statistical analysis plan skeleton.
| Topic | Prespecified approach |
|---|---|
| Primary population | Intention-to-treat. Safety population based on actual device exposure in parallel. |
| Primary analysis | Regression model appropriate to the final primary endpoint; report absolute risk difference, relative effect and confidence interval. If ordinal mRS is confirmatory, use proportional-odds modelling with assumption checks and prespecified robust sensitivity analysis. |
| Covariate adjustment | Small, prespecified set of strong prognostic variables such as age, initial rhythm, witnessed arrest/bystander CPR and time-to-ROSC, finalised before unblinding. |
| Missing data | Minimise via central follow-up. Prespecified multiple-imputation / worst-reasonable-case sensitivity depending missingness mechanism; death is not treated as ordinary missingness. |
| Multiplicity | Hierarchical testing or gatekeeping across key secondary outcomes. Exploratory biomarkers and subgroups clearly labelled. |
| Subgroups | Only a small number of mechanistically justified interactions: treatment timing, initial rhythm, baseline temperature, sex, age band, and thermal-dose achievement. No post-hoc subgroup claim substitution. |
| Intercurrent events | Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy, crossover, rescue temperature therapy and device interruption handled explicitly under the estimand framework. |
Interim & DSMB
Independent oversight without inflating false-positive risk.
Early and recurrent
DSMB/Safety Review Committee reviews unblinded safety after predefined early cohorts and then at regular information fractions. Any emergency feasibility stage can use more frequent review.
One formal interim is preferred
Illustrative Phase-III plan: one interim at ~50% information using a conservative alpha-spending boundary for overwhelming efficacy and a non-binding futility rule. Exact boundary chosen by the trial statistician.
Device, ventilation, haemodynamics, mortality
Predefined triggers for unexpected device-related SAE, ventilation compromise, clinically meaningful excess arrhythmia/hypotension, airway injury signal or a sustained mortality imbalance.
Prefer blinded nuisance-parameter update
A blinded update of control-event rate or outcome variance may be used. Unblinded effect-based adaptation should only be used if prospectively designed with type-I-error control.
Recruitment model
What it takes to enrol ~2,300 pivotal patients.
| Scenario | Active EMS / hospital networks | Randomised per network / year | Annual enrolment | Approx. active recruitment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 30 | 12 | 360 | ~6.4 years |
| Base case | 45 | 18 | 810 | ~2.8 years |
| High-performance network | 60 | 20 | 1,200 | ~1.9 years |
These are operational planning assumptions. Feasibility must be based on screened OHCA volume, eligibility fraction, deferred-consent feasibility, EMS training burden, treatment-start success and real site-by-site run-in performance.
Simulation/certification of AIRCHILL setup, airway circuit integration, randomisation, timestamp capture, adverse-event escalation and hospital handover before first enrolment.
Screen-to-randomise ratio, eligible-not-enrolled reasons, device-start success, median start delay, protocol adherence and 90-day follow-up completion.
Pause low-performing sites that cannot deliver the intended timing or follow-up; do not compensate for poor exposure quality merely by adding more patients.
Phase-II → Phase-III go/no-go
Decision rule before committing to the pivotal trial.
Proceed only if CA-2 shows: acceptable device/airway/cardiovascular safety; reproducible early treatment delivery; meaningful thermal separation; no clinically important compromise of ventilation; a control-event rate that supports feasible powering; and a neurological effect estimate whose confidence interval and mechanistic pattern justify a confirmatory study. The final pivotal N should then be recalculated from the observed AIRCHILL data rather than copied from PRINCESS2 or any other external technology.
Protocol standards & benchmarks
Framework used for the synopsis.
ISO 14155:2026 for medical-device clinical investigations · EU MDR 2017/745 Annex XV · SPIRIT protocol reporting principles · ICH E9/E9(R1) estimand/statistical principles where applicable · FDA pivotal medical-device study guidance and IDE framework · PRINCESS2 as a contemporary prehospital cooling design benchmark.